April 29, 2013
Simon Roughneen
RANGOON — Rohingya leaders have reacted angrily to the findings of the
official investigation into a wave of brutal violence that hit Arakan
State in 2012, slamming the report findings as selective and slanted.
Speaking after members of a commission formed last year to investigate
the violence presented a summary of their report today in Rangoon, Myo
Thant, a Rohingya representative of the Democracy and Human Rights
Party, told The Irrawaddy that the report did not present a completely
accurate picture of the Arakan situation.
“This report has some good suggestions, but in ways it is biased and incomplete,” he said.
Commission members, including former political prisoners Ko Ko Gyi and
Maung Thura, better known as Zarganar, launched the summary of the
commission’s findings today at the Myanmar Peace Center.
The commission recommended that the Burmese government increase security
in the troubled western region and said that resettlement of more than
100,000 displaced people should be held off until reconciliation
measures are implemented.
“It will take time for reconciliation to work, as the conflict is still
fresh,” said commission member Aung Naing Oo of the Myanmar Peace
Center, a government-backed think-tank, who added that it was more
important in the short term to address humanitarian needs in the
region.
The report summary said that “it is extremely urgent to provide the
Bengali IDPs with access to safe and secure temporary shelters prior to
the monsoon season.”
The commission proposed that the Burmese government set up a
“truth-finding committee” to look into the deeper causes of the 2012
violence, which began as rioting between Arakanese Buddhists and local
Muslims, but, say human rights groups, later took on the hallmarks of a
pogrom against Muslims, focusing on the Rohingya, a stateless minority
of around 800,000 people.
“We welcome those suggestions,” said Myo Thant, speaking after the report launch.
However, the 28-page report summary released today did not use the term
“Rohingya,” in keeping with the Burmese government’s view that the
Rohingya are immigrants from Bangladesh, which shares a border with
Burma’s Arakan State.
“How can they say we are all immigrants?” asked Myo Thant. “Arakan is
like hell, why would any Bangladeshi want to migrate to there. It makes
no sense.”
Commission member Yin Yin Nwe, an economic advisor to Burma’s President
Thein Sein, said that the report stuck with the terminology outlined by
the government. “We use the term ‘Bengali’ as this is the official term
as part of the citizenship laws,” she said.
As expected, the commission did not recommend any amendment to Burma’s
widely criticized 1982 citizenship law, which denies the Rohingya
Burmese citizenship.
Phil Robertson, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Asia
division, said that “the commission missed a critical point when it
failed to include reform of the 1982 Citizenship Act to strip out
discriminatory provisions and ensure that the law complies with
international human rights standards.”
The report summary—published in advance of the full 200-page report,
which is scheduled for release next week—said the Burmese government
“should address the citizenship claims of the Bengalis in a transparent
and accountable manner.”
Asked by The Irrawaddy how these citizenship disputes could be resolved
under the terms of the 1982 law, commission member Ko Ko Gyi said that
“the problem is not with the law as it stands, it is with the
implementation. If we practiced the law exactly, then we would not have
seen the violence in Rakhine (Arakan) State last year.”
Mohamed Salim, spokesperson for the National Development and Peace
Party, said that this refusal to acknowledge the Rohingya by name
smacked of discrimination. He also took issue with suggestions that
“family planning education” be provided to the “Bengali population,”
which the commission said could offset Arakanese fears of Rohingya
population growth.
“We are Rohingya, not Bengali, and that is the main point that is wrong
with this report,” he said. “I am angry because of that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment