Showing posts with label Huffington Post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Huffington Post. Show all posts

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Muslims In Myanmar: Trapped In Ghetto After Clashes

Jun 30.2013
Associated Press
Huffington Post

Tim Sullivan

SITTWE, Myanmar -- From inside the neighborhood that has become their prison, they can look over the walls and fences and into a living city.
Stores are open out there. Sidewalk restaurants are serving bottles of Mandalay beer. There are no barbed-wire roadblocks marking neighborhood boundaries, no armed policemen guarding checkpoints. In the rest of Sittwe, this city of 200,000 people along Myanmar's coast, no one pays a bribe to take a sick baby to the doctor.
But here it's different.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE – This story is part of "Portraits of Change," a yearlong series by The Associated Press examining how the opening of Myanmar after decades of military rule is – and is not – changing life in the long-isolated Southeast Asian country.
___
Aung Mingalar is just a few square blocks. You can walk it in 10 minutes, stopping only when you come to the end of the road and a policeman with an assault rifle waves you back inside, back into a maze of shuttered storefronts, unemployment and boredom.
In the evenings, when bats fly through the twilight, the men gather for prayers at Aung Mingalar's main mosque, the one that wasn't destroyed in last year's violence.
Zahad Tuson is among them. He had spent his life pedaling fares around this state capital, a fraying town, built by British colonials, full of bureaucrats and monsoon-battered concrete buildings. Now his bicycle rickshaw sits at home unused. He hasn't left Aung Mingalar in nearly a year.
"We could go out whenever we wanted!" he says. His voice is a mixture of anger and wonder.
What has caused this place to become a ghetto that no one can leave and few can enter? A basic fact: Aung Mingalar is a Muslim neighborhood.
A year after sectarian violence tore through Myanmar, the fury of religious pogroms has hardened into an officially sanctioned sectarian divide, a foray into apartheid-style policies that has turned Aung Mingalar into a prison for Sittwe's Muslims and that threatens this country's fragile transition to democracy.
Muslims, Tuson says, are not welcome in today's Myanmar.
It's simple, he says: "They want us gone."
___
For generations, Aung Mingalar existed as just another tangle of streets and alleys in the heart of Sittwe. It was a Muslim quarter; everybody knew that. But the distinction seldom meant much.
Until suddenly it meant everything.
Last year, violence twice erupted between two ethnic groups in this part of Myanmar: the Rakhine, who are Buddhist, and a Muslim minority known as the Rohingya. While carnage was widespread on both sides of the religious divide, it was Muslims who suffered most, and who continue to suffer badly more than a year later.
Across Rakhine state, more than 200 people were killed, 70 percent of them Muslim. In Sittwe, where Muslims were once almost half the population, five of the six Muslim neighborhoods were destroyed. Over 135,000 people remain homeless in Rakhine state, the vast majority of them Muslims forced into bamboo refugee camps that smell of dust and wood smoke and too many people living too close together.
The troubles here were, at least initially, driven by ethnicity as much as religion. To the Rakhine, who dominate this state, as well as to Myanmar's central government, the Rohingya are here illegally, "Bengalis" whose families slipped across the nearby border from what is now Bangladesh. Historians say Rohingya have been here for centuries, though many did come more recently. Their modern history has been a litany of oppression: the riots of 1942, the mass expulsions of 1978, the citizenship laws of 1982.
What started with the Rohingya has evolved into a broader anti-Muslim movement, helping ignite a series of attacks across Myanmar – from Meikhtila in the country's center, where Buddhist mobs beat dozens of Muslim students to death in March, to Lashio near the Chinese border, where Buddhist men swarmed through the city burning scores of Muslim-owned stores in May.
The violence is about religion and ethnicity, but also about what happens when decades of military rule begin giving way in the nation once known as Burma, and old political equations are clouded by the complexities of democracy.
In 2010, political change finally came to Myanmar, a profoundly isolated nation long ruled by a series of mysterious generals. Opposition leader and Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi was freed from house imprisonment. National elections were held. Former political prisoners became politicians.
Amid the tumult – and with the military still wielding immense power behind the scenes – old animosities and new politicians flourished. Ethnic groups formed powerful regional parties. Buddhist nationalists, with a deep-seated suspicion of Muslims, moved from the fringes into the mainstream.
Political frustration fed on economic frustration, with millions of poor rural residents flocking to Myanmar's cities only to find continued poverty in ever-growing slums. In a country that is about 90 percent Buddhist, Myanmar's Muslims, who number as little as 4 percent of the population, became political bogeymen.
U Shwe Maung, a top official with the Rakhine Nationalities Development Party, the state's most powerful party, will tell you about the problems with the Rohingya: They have too many children, they are angling for political clout, they claim to be citizens.
"We are not willing to live with them," the onetime high-school English teacher says in his quiet voice. He's an avuncular man, friendly and unfailingly polite. "They want to Muslimize this land. They want power."
Anti-Muslim sentiment has been magnified by an increasingly virulent strain of Buddhist nationalism, as a once-obscure group of monks nurtures populist fears of a growing Muslim threat. Muslims are criminals, they say, a "poison" driving up land prices and pushing aside the Buddhist working class. Crowds pack monasteries and prayer halls to hear the monks' speeches. Recordings are sold in sidewalk stalls along Myanmar's streets.
"They will destroy our country, our religion, our people. They will destroy the next-generation Buddhist women, since their aim is to mix their blood with ours," a popular monk, Ashin Tayzaw Thar Ra, said in a speech earlier this year. "Soon, Buddhists will have to worship in silence and fear."
___
In Aung Mingalar, they know all about fear.
The neighborhood is where Maung Than Win once served hundreds of meals a day at the little restaurant his father had opened, and where residents gathered at the Chat Cafe to gossip in the cool of twilight. It is where dozens of boys showed up every day for classes at Hafeez Skee's Islamic school, but most children attended secular schools.
It was widely seen as the wealthiest of Sittwe's Muslim neighborhoods, but it was hardly an island of economic isolation. It was a place where day laborers built thatch huts for themselves, and rich businessmen, their fortunes often made on small fleets of wooden fishing boats that troll the Bay of Bengal, built sprawling houses covered in shiny green tiles. A few families farmed gardens of watercress in a swampy area between some of the alleys. The main streets, once brick or cobblestone, had turned to dirt over the years.
"My grandfather was from Aung Mingalar. My father was from Aung Mingalar. I'm from Aung Mingalar," says Win, his teeth stained red from years of chewing betel nuts. At 32 he has spent nearly his entire life working at his restaurant, the Love Tea Shop. It filled with people every day, particularly after prayers at the mosque. "I just want to stay as long as I can."
Not that everything was perfect. Buddhist and Muslim residents of Sittwe agree at least on that.
There were fights, though they tended to be just one person against another. In the last sectarian violence, in 2001, only one person died in Sittwe. The last widespread bloodshed was during World War II, when the Rohingya backed the British colonial forces and the Rakhine supported the Japanese. Hundreds of people were killed.
"I had heard about the troubles then," says Ferus Ahmad, a pharmacist. "We thought something like this could never happen again."
But it did. It began last year on May 28, with the rape and murder of a Buddhist woman by a group of Rohingya men in a village a few hours from here. Days later, a bus carrying Muslim travelers was surrounded by a Buddhist mob and ten Muslims were killed. Five days after that, Rohingya mobs attacked Rakhine near the Bangladesh border. It's unclear how many people died.
With fear spiraling on both sides, trouble came to Sittwe. Over five days, Rakhine and Rohingya mobs battled one another. By the end, hundreds of Rakhine homes had been destroyed, as had nearly every Rohingya neighborhood. Today, other than Aung Mingalar, Muslim Sittwe is little more than destroyed mosques and once-crowded communities grown over with grass and weeds, completely empty of residents.
During the street battles, the women and children of Aung Mingalar were put into a mosque for safety, while the men protected the neighborhood's edges. Then something unusual happened: The security forces arrived to help.
Across Myanmar, the army and the police have done little to protect Muslims through a year of violence, and rights groups say they have often joined in the attacks. It's still unclear why it was different in Aung Mingalar.
But while they arrived as protectors, those soldiers soon became jailers. Today, the security forces enforce the official ghetto. And the dominant story line remains: Not only did Muslims never need protection from Buddhists, but they destroyed their own neighborhoods.
"The Bengalis lit their own houses on fire, because they knew they would get another house" in the refugee camps, says U Win Myaing, the Rakhine state assistant director for communications. "Plus, they thought the fires would spread to Rakhine areas and burn those houses down."
Increasingly, such stories about Muslims are believed across Myanmar.
___
Today, Aung Mingalar is consuming itself.
House after wooden house has been torn down for firewood. The dead, who can no longer be taken out to the Muslim cemetery, are buried behind the mosque. Food, which comes from occasional government handouts and the twice-weekly markets some residents can attend, is scarce and expensive.
There are no stores left open, just a few food stalls and a makeshift pharmacy that sells laxatives and herbal headache medicine.
There are also few heroes. Residents say wealthy Rohingya have bought land from poorer or more desperate neighbors. While the authorities occasionally allow some Rohingya into the neighborhood to sell supplies, they charge double what customers pay on the outside.
"People aren't competing with each other," says Win, the tea shop owner, "but they are not working together either."
Officials refuse to say when – or if – Aung Mingalar will be allowed to rejoin the rest of Sittwe.
There is one way to get out. The bribe to pass the checkpoints is 10,000 kyats (about $10) each way, according to current and former residents. That's a lot of money here, but plenty of people are paying it. While no one is sure of the neighborhood's size – aid workers say it was probably about 4,000 before the violence – it's now dropping fast.
"When everything they have is gone, people just want to leave," Win says.
Thousands have left Myanmar, paying smugglers to slip them into Malaysia or Thailand. But most head to the refugee camps outside towns, endless rows of bamboo shelters filled with Rohingya. Many of the camps are restricted areas – residents are not allowed to come and go as they wish – but most are also large enough to have their own economies.
Across Myanmar, many Muslims are now more closed-off than they once were, barricading their neighborhoods at night against possible attackers. But so far, at least, Aung Mingalar is the only sealed ghetto.
Ahmad, the pharmacist, lived in Aung Mingalar for 38 years. Until the violence of 2012, he owned a pharmacy in Sittwe's main market, a warren of shops near the port. But soon after the trouble started, Aung Mingalar was sealed and Ahmad couldn't get to his shop. The medicines expired. His customers went elsewhere. The shop has been closed for months.
Ahmad wonders at what has happened to his country. The 2010 transition was supposed to bring change, but he's seen nothing to encourage him.
"We now have a president, a government," says Ahmad, his button-down shirt faded from so many washings. "But it's like there is no ruler."
For many like him, the main sustenance now is memories. That is what keeps Ahmad going.
A couple of times a week, back when things were good, Ahmad would close his pharmacy, pick up his wife and two children at home and head to the Sittwe beach, barely a mile away. Now, only Rakhine are allowed at the beach and Ahmad has left the neighborhood where he grew up. His family is still there, but he has moved to the refugee camps, where he seeks work and tries to remember what normal felt like.
"We'd just walk along the beach," he says of those family outings. "I dream about that sometimes."

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Myanmar's Rohingya Muslims Wait in Refugee Camps as Buddhist Leaders Dismiss 'Genocide'

June 24,2013
Huffington Post
Kevin Douglas Grant


2013-06-21-UWirathu.JPG
GlobalPost-Open Hands Initiative reporting fellows interview the Buddhist monk U Wirathu, founder of the anti-Muslim 969 movement, in Mandalay, Myanmar. (Marc Laban/AsiaWorks Television)



YANGON, Myanmar — As an estimated 140,000 Rohingya Muslims sat captive in squalid refugee camps in Rakhine State and across the border in Thailand and Bangladesh, a group of red-robed Buddhist leaders gathered here in Yangon last week, dismissing what human rights groups have called a genocide as “illusions created by the Arab media.”


“I really take pity on [my critics],” said the Buddhist monk U Wirathu, founder of Myanmar’s 969 movement, accused of mobilizing a campaign of murder, arson and displacement against Muslims in Rakhine and across the country. “They are under the influence of media backed by the Arab world. Europeans and Americans are educated people, but sometimes certain illusions are created by the Arab media.”


Myo Win, who in 2007 founded an organization in Yangon to promote peace between Buddhist and Muslims, called 969 a “countrywide racist movement” with roots in the Burmese government’s rising Buddhist nationalism and three-tiered citizenship laws. Though crimes against humanity committed against Rohingya are overt examples, ethnic and religious biases strongly shape all facets of life here.


“Wirathu is one of the actors of that hate speech movement,” Myo Win said. “But the responsibility falls on the government authority. Where is our constitution? Where is our rule of law? Where is the law enforcement? Where is the responsibility of Buddhists?”


The answers to some of these questions, said long-blacklisted Swedish journalist Bertil Lintner, may exist in the fact that Myanmar is experiencing “the emergence of a new nationalism.”


“Suddenly many people are proud about being Burmese,” he said. “Five years ago this country was an international outcast, a pariah of the world...The new nationalists, they put up a picture of the three warrior kings, and they've got the new army, not the old ragtag army that had to fight in the army against ethnics and communist rebels, but the modern army, the tanks, jet fighters, frigates, and then the third symbol is Buddhism. So the interpretation of this that in order to be Burmese you have to be Buddhist.”


But Myo Win, though born in Yangon, is Muslim. His Smile Education and Development Foundation operates from within a spartan low-rise in downtown Yangon, not far from a mosque, a Hindu temple and St. Mary's Cathedral — the largest Catholic church in the country. The organization offers English classes, interfaith educational programs and women’s empowerment courses among other initiatives.


"My school was majority Buddhist and three or four Muslims out of thousands of students,” said Myo Win, who became an imam after training in Pakistan. “I faced some discriminations since I was young. People always joking, looking down on the color of my skin. I realized why there was that kind of discrimination. Education is the most important thing."


Myo Win cited Myanmar’s 1982 Citizenship Law, a stratified system that favors those of an “indigenous race” as part of an apartheid-like structure felt acutely by ethnic and religious minorities like the Rohingya, who are not recognized as one of the country’s official ethnic groups and therefore have no path to citizenship and the benefits that go with it.


“There has been violence and discrimination against Muslims since independence,” he said. “And not only the Muslims, but the non-Buddhist people.”


Myo Win said he saw a nationwide spike in anti-Muslim sentiment in 1997, when a mob of more than 1,000 Buddhist monks rampaged against Muslim homes and holy sites in Mandalay. Myo Win and a group of his colleagues sent formal letters of concern to the Ministry of Religious Affairs and to the Sangha Association, the Buddhist seat of power in Myanmar.


"We noticed it very early and said to the government, ‘Please, do something. If you don't stop it, it will be a bigger problem soon.’” he said. “But they neglected, they didn't take care of it at all."


Now, Myo Win says, a civil rights movement is underway among some progressive Buddhists and Muslims that rejects the new Buddhist nationalism.


As Burmese journalist Swe Win wrote in The New York Times in April, “The general public in Myanmar, which is largely Buddhist (about 90 percent) and ethnic Bamar (over 65 percent), would like to believe that the Buddhist monks who allegedly participated in these brutal incidents aren’t real monks. That’s easier than contemplating the painful reality that the venerated Buddhist order, the Sangha, has become largely corrupt.”


Last year Rakhine State erupted into brutal ethnic and religious violence that killed more than 160 people, and mobs have assembled in locations across the country at various times so far in 2013, with victims predominantly Muslim.


"So many Muslim mosques and Muslim houses have been burned down in the middle of the night by so-called Buddhist men,” Myo Win said. “And the people have not been able to come back up to this day."


The monk Wirathu and his supporters are now pushing a new law that would impose strict limits on Buddhists’ ability to marry outside of their own faith. And in Rakhine, the western coastal state that borders Bangladesh, Rohingya are limited to two children per couple and must undergo an extensive application process to marry.


Human Rights Watch has called on the Burmese government to end the genocide in Rakhine and to repeal the two-child law there. Meanwhile opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi said she believes the 1982 Citizenship Law should be reviewed.


Many members of parliament have objected to amending the law, reported Eleven Myanmar, and it is unlikely to come up for debate during the current session.


"This law was to protect State’s security and stability and ethnic affairs. The '82 law does not need to be amended,” said parliament member Ba Shein of the Rakhine National Development Party. “The amendment to the law is aimed at changing illegal immigrants into legal ones. It is unnatural.”


One of Myanmar’s government-run newspapers, The New Light of Myanmar, ran a long response to Eleven Myanmar on Wednesday in support of the law under a banner reading, “The Earth cannot swallow a race to extinction, but another race can.”

Sunday, May 19, 2013

The Rohingya of Burma -- Betrayed by Aung San Sui Kyi

May 17,2013

Huffington Post
Azeem Ibrahim


"In the end we will remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends." -- Martin Luther King.
The continuing silence of Aung San Sui Kyi on the plight of the Rohingya Muslims in Burma continues to confound and dismay all those who welcomed her return to the international scene as the moral voice of Burma.
Aung San Sui Kyi has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, has received honorary degrees and awards, has met with royalty and presidents including President Obama and has been credited with bringing Myanmar or Burma back into the world of nations. So it makes her refusal to condemn the genocide even more puzzling and indeed, deplorable.
The Rohingya are a persecuted religious and linguistic minority who have lived for generations on the western coast of Burma. The Burmese government, still dominated by the military in spite of so-called democratic reforms, insists they are relatively recent illegal migrants from neighboring Bangladesh, as if this is justification for the systematic and continuing state sponsored violence against these people.
Six months of sectarian violence have driven more than 125,000 people from their homes. Forcibly segregated and rejected as citizens by both Bangladesh and Burma, they continue to be victimized in the internally displaced person (IDP) camps where they have sought shelter.
Conditions in the camps are appalling as local Buddhists are preventing aid agencies from gaining access to Rohingya camps. Security forces expected to provide protection for displaced Muslims have instead acted as their jailers, preventing access to markets, livelihoods and humanitarian assistance, which is desperately needed. What is increasingly obvious is that the Burmese government is conducting an organized campaign to forcibly relocate or remove the state's Muslims.
The Burmese government under President Thein Sein has taken no serious steps to hold accountable those responsible or to prevent future outbreaks of violence. Failing to intervene and participating directly in the violence makes the government complicit in ethnic cleansing under international law.
Since the 1990s UN special rapporteurs have identified countless widespread and systematic abuses against the Rohingya Muslims resulting from state policy. The government's formal response to the recent violence has been to form an investigative commission, which has as yet failed to produce a report. Prompted by international outrage, President Thein Sein wrote to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon condemning the "criminal acts" and senseless violence", a message repeated just prior to President Obama's visit to Burma.
Since then, the violence has only increased with anti-Muslim violence spreading to central Burma with thousands more people being killed, wounded and displaced. The organization Genocide Watch updated the "Genocide Emergency" for Burmese Muslims on April 4 2013, calling them one of the most oppressed ethnic groups in the world. State-supported violence against Muslims not only continues a long pattern of discrimination, but is also a reminder that genocidal violence against Muslims, Shin, Karen, and other minorities remains rampant in Myanmar.
So Aung San Suu Kyi's reticence and refusal to condemn attacks on the Rohingya in Myanmar has dimmed the Nobel laureate's reputation among global rights campaigners who feel she should use her moral authority to step up and condemn the Burmese government. But observers also note she is widely expected to win the general elections in 2015 that could install her as Myanmar's next president and support for Burma's Muslims could hurt her with the core anti-Islamic Buddhist constituency at the elections.
If this is true, and she is putting her personal ambitions before humanitarian and compassionate considerations, then she has no moral right to keep the Nobel Peace Prize. And it is hard to see that the people of Burma will maintain respect and admiration for a leader who has championed the rule of law yet failed to speak out against anti-Islamic prejudice and violence.
According to Chris Lewa, the Bangkok-based director of The Arakan Project, which lobbies for Rohingya rights, Suu Kyi is failing a vital test of leadership. According to international norms, her silence on the genocide in Burma is also failing a vital test of humanitarian global justice.
Dr Azeem Ibrahim is the Executive Chairman of The Scotland Institute and a Fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding

Follow Azeem Ibrahim on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AzeemIbrahim      

Saturday, April 6, 2013

#RohingyaNOW


Thousands of Rohingya flee religious persecution in Myanmar, many dying along the way. Thanks to Anonymous, #RohingyaNOW is trending on Twitter, but will it matter?






Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Rohingya: Testing Democracy in Myanmar


February 20, 2013
Huffington Post
Jose Ramos-Horta & Muhammad Yunus

One of the fundamental challenges of a democracy is how to ensure the voice of the majority does not trample the essential rights of the minority. In the founding of the United States this was addressed by the Bill of Rights, some form of which is integrated into most democracies today.
Even as we applaud and rejoice in the new freedoms enjoyed by the Myanmar people, the country's newly elected government must face this challenge as they evolve from autocratic rule into a democratic state. The tragedy of the Rohingya people, continuing to unfold in Rakhine State in the country's western corner, on the border of Bangladesh, will be its proving ground.
The minority Muslim Rohingya continue to suffer unspeakable persecution, with more than 1,000 killed and hundreds of thousands displaced from their homes just in recent months, apparently with the complicity and protection of security forces.
The charge that the Rohingya are illegal immigrants to Myanmar is false. There is evidence that the Rohingya have been in present day Myanmar since the 8th century. It is incontrovertible that Muslim communities have existed in Rakhine State since the 15th century, added to by descendants of Bengalis migrating to Arakan (Rakhine) during colonial times.
The borders between present-day Bangladesh and Myanmar have shifted back and forth throughout these periods, resulting in ethnic Rakhine Buddhists living in Bangladesh today, and ethnic Bengali Muslims such as the Rohingya in Myanmar. As the Rahkine Buddhists are rooted in their Bangladeshi communities today, the Rakhine State in Myanmar is the only home the Rohingya know.
A glaring injustice was done to the Rohingya in 1982 when the ruling junta instituted a new law excluding the Rohingya from the list of the 135 national races recognized by the Myanmar government, effectively stripping them of their nationality. Since that time they have been banned from travelling even short distances or from getting married without a permit. When a marriage permit is granted, they must sign a commitment to have no more than two children.
Half of the Rohingya population is estimated to have fled the periodic pogroms that have reduced their villages to ashes and left thousands killed or raped in horrendous massacres. After having lived side by side with the Rakhine Buddhist communities, today they are an uprooted and stateless population, with some 200,000 refugees estimated to still be living in neighboring Bangladesh and hundreds of thousands more having fled to other parts of the world.
The 20th century gave us a term for the ugly phenomena of stripping individuals of their nationality and persecuting them for no reason other than the color of their skin, their religion, or their ethnicity: ethnic cleansing.
When the Myanmar government considers its progress on reform toward an open and democratic system of government, they must address one of the most barbaric remnants of their recent past, ethnic cleansing taking place in their midst, and right the wrongs done to the Rohingya population.
We wish the Rohingya to know that they are not alone. We hope to help share their plight with the world, in the hope and faith and trust that when the world knows of their suffering it will no longer turn its back on their persecution.
We humbly add our voices to the simple demand of the Rohingya people: that their rights as our fellow human beings be respected, that they be granted the right to live peacefully and without fear in the land of their parents, and without persecution for their ethnicity or their form of worship.
We ask the world to not look away, but to raise its collective voice in support of the Rohingya. In these days of public diplomacy the citizens, civil societies, NGOs, private investors and the business community have a vital role to play in the context of democratic reforms, human rights and development around the globe. We must use this voice.
We close with an appeal to the Myanmar government. You must amend the infamous 1982 law, and welcome the Rohingya as full citizens of Myanmar with all attendant rights. In doing so you will end the possibility of the radicalization of the Rohingya and channel their energies for the development of Myanmar. You will remove the impetus for extremism and terrorism being generated by the current mistreatment of this vulnerable minority. A strong, stable and democratic Myanmar is not only in the interest to countries of the region, but will serve the cause of global peace and stability as well.
A government must in the end be judged by how it protects the most vulnerable people in its midst, and its generosity towards the weakest and most powerless. Let not the good work of this government be clouded by the continuing persecution of the Rohingya people.
Jose Ramos-Horta is Former President of Timor Leste and the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Muhammad Yunus is Founder and Former Managing Director of Grameen Bank and the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize laureate.

On the trail of Myanmar's Rohingya migrants

24 May 2015  BBC News Malaysian authorities say they have discovered a number of mass graves near the border with Thailand.